Somewhere between the imagery of Ozu, the tone & pacing of Bresson and a very dark event loosely based on something that really happened lies Distance - the story about the trauma left behind from the actions of a death cult. Had this movie been made by any other director there’s a strong chance it would’ve been “edgy” & exploitative. Koreeda's execution is more subdued. Instead of focusing directly on cults and suicide, Koreeda drops us in the aftermath of everything and we’re left to put the pieces together..
In Distance, we follow the family of cult members that attempted to poison Tokyo’s water supply. Things didn’t go according to plan but the cult did follow through with a mass suicide. Three years later, their family members gather at the cult’s former base to observe the anniversary of their deaths (in a way - they sort of form their own cult).
Neither Ozu or Bresson would ever make a movie like this but the visual similarities and surface-level influences are undeniable to me.
Koreeda has never shied away from shouting out Bresson's work...
When it comes to Ozu, Koreeda is a bit more dismissive. He has acknowledged the comparisons others have made but he clearly isn't a fan...
I think part of the reason Koreeda dismisses/resents(?) the Ozu comparison is partially because it is a bit lazy and predictable to compare two Japanese filmmakers that make contemplative dramas. But Distance has some serious (surface-level) Ozu imagery to me (sorry if this makes me lazy).
| L'Argent / Distance |
L’ARGENT is like a textbook, which I review before shooting each new film of mine - Hirokazu Kore-eda, thefilmstage.com
| L'Argent / Distance |
| L'Argent / Distance |
![]() |
| L'Argent / Distance |
The motif of family in STILL WALKING is similar to MABOROSI, so perhaps that’s where the Ozu comparison comes from - Hirokazu Koreeda, therumpus.net
I think part of the reason Koreeda dismisses/resents(?) the Ozu comparison is partially because it is a bit lazy and predictable to compare two Japanese filmmakers that make contemplative dramas. But Distance has some serious (surface-level) Ozu imagery to me (sorry if this makes me lazy).
I also find it funny when a legendary director like Ozu is called influential and impactful in text form only and no one questions it or asks for a specific example, but when you show countless VISUAL similarities, suddenly everyone takes issue with it or can't make the correlation.
Koreeda pulled the idea of the death cult and their plan to poison Tokyo’s water supply from the real events of the Aum Supreme Cult and their attempt to carry out a chemical weapons attack on the Tokyo subway in 1995. Because Distance is loosely based on this tragic event, the movie challenges the idea of who deserves to be grieved.
Koreeda pulled the idea of the death cult and their plan to poison Tokyo’s water supply from the real events of the Aum Supreme Cult and their attempt to carry out a chemical weapons attack on the Tokyo subway in 1995. Because Distance is loosely based on this tragic event, the movie challenges the idea of who deserves to be grieved.
Grief and the idea of dealing with it has become such a vague subject. Especially in film. It’s gotten to the point where every movie is about grief in some way that it sort of lessens the definition. But Distance is one of the exceptions. Not only is the film about grief and how one deals with loss, but Koreeda complicates things by making the lost loved ones cult members who planned to kill thousands. Do they deserved to be grieved by their loved ones even if they attempted to pull off an unforgivable crime? Perhaps that isn’t for anyone outside of family to question.
