Showing posts with label rarities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rarities. Show all posts

Friday, August 30, 2013

MY LIFE IN AN AMBUSH OF GHOSTS (SPECIAL GUEST WRITER: NATHANIEL DRAKE CARLSON)

Thanks to Netflix, multi-region DVD's & Youtube uploads, movies are becoming less & less rare these days but Everett Lewis' 1993 film; An Ambush Of Ghosts still holds the mystique of being one of the few truly rare modern films in existence. I've never seen this but luckily Nathaniel Drake Carlson, who contributed to PINNLAND EMPIRE at the beginning of the year, is one of the few people who has.

Enjoy...


Everett Lewis's 1993 film An Ambush of Ghosts is a genuine lost masterpiece, though in this case "lost" for reasons simply having to do with distributor resistance. I was fortunate enough to see the film at a rare public screening in 2001 on the campus of USC with both director Lewis and his cinematographer, Judy Irola, in attendance. It remains to date the pinnacle moment of a long personal journey for me of uncovering and seeking out the film itself.

My initial awareness of it came shortly after the January '93 Sundance premiere. As a great fan of the British classical synth group In the Nursery I discovered their soundtrack to Ambush later that year and was utterly captivated by its dark majesty.The album also includes dialogue extracts which just served to further heighten my restless anticipation. But nothing ever came of that. The film premiered at the Sundance Film Festival to acclaim and then effectively disappeared, almost never to be heard of again and without even the consolation of a video release anywhere.


Ambush was likely ahead of its time and too singular an achievement for the independent film marketplace of 1993. It preceded the wave of other stylish visions of goth darkness like Seven, Requiem for a Dream, Donnie Darko and even The Crow. In many respects though its closest tonal equivalent seems to me to be the bracing and anguished contemporary fairy tales of Philip Ridley. Ambush concerns a troubled teenager named George (Stephen Dorff) living in a suburb of Los Angeles. A decade prior he witnessed the accidental killing of his younger brother by their mother, Irene (Geneviève Bujold). He was hit by her car when he ran behind her while he played catch with George. In the time since, mom has gone slowly mad, often driving her husband to use sedatives and restraints to appease her. George, meanwhile, finds another teen boy hiding in the family shed. Evidently Christian has also killed someone by accident, a rival during a fight at the local high school. However, his story is contradicted by vibrant, blood red flashbacks which present another reality altogether. George attempts to act as an intermediary but finds his situation complicated as he develops feelings for Christian's girlfriend, Denise. The film ends with the reality of everything we have seen called into question.

The narrative itself is compelling but it's the formal elements and how they translate that text which are the source of the film's accomplishment. Irola (who won the cinematography award at Sundance for Ambush) describes the style she and Lewis crafted as "painterly", specifically derived from the look of such artists as Caravaggio and Vermeer but also inspired by the films of Dreyer and Antonioni. Notable as well is the fact that the cast, though largely filled with unknowns at the time, features the likes of Anne Heche, David Arquette and, most significantly, Dorff as George. Variety singled out Dorff's performance for praise and Detour magazine referred to it as the strongest male performance at Sundance that year. Producer Robert Shulevitz told me that it wasn't all acclaim, however. At Sundance the audience was given cards to rate the film on a numerical basis between 0 and 5. As indication of the polarized responses to come, Ambush received a lot of 6's and 0's. Later, the film sold out a six hundred seat theater at the Seattle Film Festival on the basis of a blurb in the programme announcing the cast alone. By the end of its 90 minute running time two-thirds of the audience had walked out. If nothing else, An Ambush of Ghosts was never to be met with indifference.


Shulevitz describes how several distributors attempted to handle the film but found its tone far too authentically raw and painful to manage a sale. One distributor even wanted to completely eliminate the first ten minutes (a sequence of highly stylized and intensely personal torment which Lewis describes as a "mnemonic melody of the past madness" and says was the most cut and recut sequence in the picture). Others balked at the stunningly dark sequences. Video distribution even became a problem when it came clear that the dark palette of the film was outside the legal limits of color contrast allowed for most US TV sets. So then both style and substance have served as stumbling blocks but Lewis acknowledges that was always going to be a problem. He notes that rather than simply regurgitate yet another variant on the conventionally familiar dysfunctional family genre a decision was made during production to take a far more strenuous route--to replicate through the composition and form of the film the mental state of a disturbed, even insane individual.

Ambush uses the dysfunctional family/adolescent angst genre simply as a starting point for an exploration of the real suffering so often glossed over by films of this type. Its focus is laser like in precision and just as intensely invasive. The structure and tone contribute to a sense of dislocation while making a case for the appropriate use of an operatic style to access and convey authentic emotional states. Instead of a gradual development toward specific emotional heights Ambush immediately presents a scenario of totalizing trauma but one that has receded internally and can thus be represented in grandly formalist terms. George and Irene reel in their own separate universes of absolute, enveloping despair. Much of the opening is meant to establish that this is not going to be a naturalistic presentation of grief but rather only about one aspect suspended and maintained indefinitely and with no way out (we see too that the restoration of the family home, in process at the time of the accident, is equally suspended). Both characters share some sense of guilt, the notion that they could have or should have done something differently, but they are each too far gone to share the burden or to commiserate as a way of alleviating the pain. So they are condemned to private hell. The notion of a decade having passed like this only adds to the sense of devastation.

The infamous first ten minutes depict how this plays out. We see what we at first believe to be legitimate home video footage of the incident, only gradually realizing that no one would have actually recorded this. It represents how we maintain our memories: in bleeding and blurring still frames of significance. We see Bujold in her dead son's room, still preserved like a shrine, wailing on his bed. We see her lie in the gravel of the driveway behind the car in the same spot and position taken by her lost child when he was taken from her, by her. Later we see her being sedated and restrained in bed with shackles to quell her hysteria. This is enacted by the ineffectual father figure played with a sublime understated grace by Bruce Davison. The father has scarcely any role here because he does not share the same direct experience of the pain associated with this tragedy and thus must be confined forever to the periphery. But everyone is equally confined and isolated.


Dorff, for his part, remains locked in medium close-up for these opening minutes, barely distinguishable through a lattice work of shadow. He talks to his dead brother, crying out for him, for his own void to be filled. The intensive focus of these early scenes makes the sequence seem to last even longer than it does and yet, somehow, also to last virtually no time at all, such is its hypnotic effectiveness. Certainly though there was something uniquely thrilling about witnessing just this sequence alone, something of such clear and undeniably uncompromising conviction.

Once the tone proper has been established the film begins after brief opening credits. The main thrust of the narrative revolves around George's discovery of the young man named Christian (Alan Boyce) hiding in the family garage after accidentally killing another student in a fist fight. Christian befriends George, mostly as a means to an end, and enlists him to act as an intermediary between himself and his girlfriend Denise (Anne Heche).

It is here, in this seemingly arbitrary plot development, where An Ambush of Ghosts truly takes off. The film implies the connection between George and Christian, both of whom are accidental murderers. But there are further disturbing intimations that Christian may have been more cognizant of his actions then he lets on, perhaps even more then he may consciously know.

There is, for instance, an early scene--brilliantly played--in which Christian attempts to convince George of his relative innocence, that things just got out of hand. But intercut throughout are the red tinted flashbacks to what we can only imagine is a more objective truth: Christian's brutal attack, viciously assaulting the other boy on the hood of a car in an empty parking lot. Is Christian a liar trying to save himself? Is he blocking out the incident or is he far more calculating than that, far more deviously dangerous? Or, perhaps, is his guilt really a projection of George's own perception of himself, of his concerns about complicity with his brother's death? The implications are vast, made all the more painful because they are never elaborated upon. We simply cannot know.

The depth of what is accomplished within this simple set-up can't be overstated. George believes Christian when he says that he came to him because he feels he can confide in George. Dorff's character is so emotionally stunted that he grasps at even this transparent manipulation as sincere because he so desperately needs to believe it. He goes on to form an unhealthy attachment to Christian and later to Denise. As older girls sometimes do with younger boys who are clearly awkward around them, she flagrantly flirts with George in an attempt to disarm him. He, of course, takes it as the real thing.

There is an incredible, elaborate funeral sequence for the murdered boy, almost entirely without dialogue but a showcase for virtuosic moving camera work, evocative scoring by In the Nursery and heightened though nuanced performances. George holds Denise but it is evident in the gesture and the inflection of the body language that he is not comforting her--he is at his own brother's funeral and he is comforting himself.


As the picture winds down Christian prepares to turn himself in, reasoning that it is the only thing he can do. George can not deal with the prospect of abandonment yet again. While embracing Christian farewell he plunges one of his mother's sedative needles into Christian's arm, proceeds to strip him down to the waist and shackle him to the wall with his mother's wrist restraints. The scene is played at a furious, high pitched level, mostly in theatrical long shot similar to some of Greenaway's tableau set pieces, lit Vermeer like with pools of light in surrounding darkness. The movie even goes so far as to include a scene in which Christian awakens, toys with the idea of escaping, then reflects back on George's pleas for him to stay and basically decides to do so, remaining George's prisoner in the shed. But is he a prisoner of love, desire or just desperate need? An Ambush of Ghosts leaves these kind of questions tantalizingly open, suggesting that the answer could very well be all of the above.

Dorff manages to carry his character so far into psychosis as to pass beyond heightened caricature and back into a newly consecrated harrowing reality. It's a penetratingly authentic performance even in the midst of the gorgeously overwrought spectacle of the film itself. His job is almost impossible in its difficulty as he must be weak and indecisive and yet selfish, ravenously insecure and needy, victimizer as well as victim, often all at the same time.

An Ambush of Ghosts ends with a sequence in which George finally goes completely over the edge losing whatever grip he had left on his tenuously held stability. And we see that via an altered version of the opening home video style flashbacks, this time with George at eighteen. Here he can alter the history of the event that destroyed his family's peace. He can rush to rescue his brother and salvage his mother's sanity. The ending is "happy" in the same way as that of Gilliam's Brazil. Our hero can finally attain some measure of peace but at what cost, at what necessary retreat from reality? The other questions it provokes are similar as well: is a happy ending always illusory? Does it have to be? Is this even an ending? Whatever the answers to these questions, it is, strictly speaking, a genuine catharsis as climax. In the case of An Ambush of Ghosts there is the additional issue as to how much of what we have seen functions solely as a projection of George's fractured psyche. There is the possibility, too, that it may be a case of subjectifying all experience as in Eyes Wide Shut.

Any summary of Ambush, however detailed, can only approximate its overwhelming sensory impact. It is a rare work of an ultra refined cinematic aesthetic, one which somehow manages to sustain for its entire duration an operatic pitch made up from what is dreamlike and what is all too painfully, recognizably real. Its unrelenting intensity can be exhausting, especially when translated through Everett Lewis's rigorous compositions, but that is also the source of its uniquely profound effect. As the director himself has said, most films are heavily mediated experiences intent on prioritizing what elements surface in each scene but in Ambush all the elements of every scene go hell-for-leather. There is no prioritizing. The experience of the film is a virtual assault upon the senses.

In the body of Lewis' work, which continues to expand and increase, Ambush stands out for its extreme formalism. Many of his films since (like 1996's Skin & Bone and 2002's Luster) have almost been a repudiation of that approach to filmmaking. They are marked by a much looser, free form quality that gives the impression of a more natural, even spontaneous, capturing of events. It should be noted too that they are also all concerned with a treatment of pronounced gay themes. This is something that may be said to have existed in more nascent form in his first features (1990's The Natural History of Parking Lots as well as Ambush) but becomes prominent afterwards. I like that aspect of those early films, though; the way in which the element of homoeroticism is simply not overtly acknowledged but rather infused into the text, allowing for a more subtle range of expression and acting as only one angle of interpretation among many. While there is much to be admired about Lewis's developing style and his other films, that should not and cannot obscure the specific nature of the accomplishment of Ambush. With any luck his continuing and increasing cinematic relevance will prompt an interest in his back catalogue as well. There always remains hope that somehow whatever it is that has acted to impede the official release of the film will someday be removed. One can only hope. And, of course, spread the word.

Friday, October 12, 2012

MARY: ABEL FERRARA'S MISUNDERSTOOD MASTERPIECE

Besides Ghost Dog, most of what I write about Forest Whitaker on PINNLAND EMPIRE isn’t very nice. This may be a little misleading to some of you readers because he’s actually one of my favorite actors so I owe him this blog entry which is full of nothing but nice things (for the most part). I don't mean to be so harsh on him but it’s just that he hasn't been in a good film or taken a worthy role in a while. Actually his last great performance was in a film that hasn't even been seen by most people outside of Europe (which is a bit strange because it isn’t even a European film). Mary, Abel Ferrara's 2005 religious drama that didn't get released theatrically until 2010, might be the greatest piece of acting Forest Whitaker has ever done in his entire career with the exception of maybe Bird and his stint on The Shield. It played at big festivals like Toronto & Venice, but like so many small films that make the festival circuit it had a tough time getting a distributor and barely saw the light of day. One moment Whitaker is explosive & scary (in a scene where he discovers his wife had complications with her pregnancy) and the next minute he's a vulnerable insecure cry-baby on his knees in church begging god for forgiveness (his character in the film is not only a fraud but he also cheats on his wife). Now, Mary isn’t JUST about Forest Whitaker (the film also stars Juliette Binoche, Marion Cotillard, Matthew Modine & Heather Graham) but he still kinda steals the show. Giving an actor free range to do whatever he/she wants can be a gamble and I get the feeling that’s the advice Ferrara gave Whitaker (the two have worked together before on The Invasion Of The Body Snatchers remake). Luckily Forest Whitaker didn't take advantage of that advice (that Ferrara may have very well not even given him but for all intents & purposes of this blog entry - let’s just imagine he did). Whitaker is calm and controlled in some moments when his character needs to be and when it’s time to go all out and lose it - he does. This is an Abel Ferrara film, so heavy handed religion (specifically Catholicism) should be expected. Not many people have come close to matching Harvey Keitel’s intensity in the chapel scene at the end of Bad Lieutenant (Abel Ferrara's masterpiece) but I'd say Whitaker came very close in an almost identical scene. Giving Forest Whitaker so much praise almost feels pointless as Mary doesn't even have a US region DVD yet and its main theatrical run was only for one week at Anthology Film Archives (unless I’m mistaken). If you happen to own a Multi-region DVD player I highly recommend getting this. Not only is Whitaker great, but so is the film…kinda. …Ok look, I’m gonna be honest - Mary is FAR from a masterpiece but I needed to call it that in order to get your attention. It IS very “interesting”. Let’s call it a flawed masterpiece. I appreciate the fact that Mary, along with Ferrara’s last seven years of work, is evidence that he’s still growing as a filmmaker (no matter how old he is) and is putting aside his fascination of working with rappers and “gangsta” culture (Ice-T, Schooly D, King Of New York, etc).

Mary wasn't exactly a response to Mel Gibson and The Passion Of The Christ...but at the same time it kinda was. In the film Matthew Modine plays; "Tony Childress" - an egocentric filmmaker/actor (clearly half modeled after Gibson and half Modeled after Ferrara himself) who's just finished shooting a film about the life of Christ told from the perspective of Mary Magdalene titled; "This Is My Blood". Childress’ film has some striking similarities to not just The Passion Of The Christ but The Last Temptation Of Christ as well (which, coincidentally stars quite a few Abel Ferrara regulars like Willem Dafoe, Harvey Keitel & Victor Argo) and its causing quite an uproar - the lead actress; "Marie Palesi" (played by Juliette Binoche) has a nervous breakdown once the production wraps, runs off to Jerusalem to find herself and become closer with God, theaters that are scheduled to play the film are receiving bomb threats all over the U.S. and everyone from The Black Panthers to the Jewish community are up in arms for reasons ranging from racism to anti-Semitism (sound familiar?). When sensational talk show host; "Ted Younger" (Whitaker) sees an opportunity to expose Childress and his film, he invites him and Marie on to his show (Tony agrees to appear on the show as long as Ted comes to the movie premier which will give it more publicity). The only problem is that Marie is somewhere in Jerusalem with no plans of leaving any time soon and no one can contact her. Ted finally manages to reach her (he’s been having an affair with one of her friends played by Marion Cotillard) but Marie has no interest in appearing on his show or going to the premier of the film either. She’s given up acting and has become this new spiritual person. Halfway in to the film Ted Younger (who's been unfaithful to his pregnant wife, played by Heather Graham) has a spiritual breakdown, admits he’s a phony (his talk show is geared towards religion and theology but he admits to not really believing in god) and seeks out Marie for some kind of spiritual guidance. The "guy who once had faith in God but now doesn't" character is a bit cliché and has been explored numerous times from Diary Of A Country Priest (Bresson) & Under The Sun Of Satan (Pilat) to Italian For Beginners & To The Wonder (Malick), but Whitaker breathes new life in to that role and plays it differently (and more volatile) than anyone else has (to my knowledge at least). Binoche also gives a good performance and Marion Cotillard, who only appears in two scenes, is good too. Between Whitaker & Binoche (who never share any screen time together in Mary, they only talk on the phone) I'm surprised this film didn't get any kind of play in 2005. I guess Mary was overshadowed by two other films that came out that same year - Cache (one of the 10 best films of the decade which co-starred Binoche) and The Last King Of Scotland (Whitaker's Oscar winning performance).


It’s understandable that Mary would be misunderstood by the few people who’ve seen it. The film is a bit chaotic, the editing and transitions from one scene to the next are abrupt from time to time, there isn't much insight or depth in to why Juliette Binoche's character suddenly has a breakdown, there’s an explosion scene that looks totally fake due to the bad CGI effect explosion and Matthew Modine's performance isn't very good in my opinion (I've never really been a fan outside of Married To The Mob). Additionally, Whitaker and Graham playing husband & wife also seemed a little…I dunno what the term is, but it’s like he was trying too hard to show an interracial couple on screen where race isn’t the issue. But on the flipside, that is a somewhat progressive (and realistic) representation of many married couples today. Plus there wasn’t a whole lot of chemistry between Whitaker & Graham (at no fault of Whitaker’s). Maybe that was the problem – I just can’t imagine those two together in real life. Religion on film (especially Catholicism & Christianity) can turn people off pretty easily (and like I already said; Abel Ferrara can be a bit heavy handed with the religion stuff). But I appreciate Ferrara’s honest & genuine attempt at trying to do something different. Plus the score is really good and goes with the film well. Given the plot, along with the year it was released (one year after The Passion) many people thought he was just trying to ride the coattails of The Passion when in fact he was just trying to address it which is something he (and any other filmmaker) has every right to do. It’s just unclear whether or not Ferrara was being critical of Gibson or supporting his right to make The Passion. Even Ferrara's motives and mission behind Mary seemed unclear. In the film, Modine's character is somewhat of a megalomaniac who only cares about the hype & publicity around his new movie while on the other hand he becomes a martyr for free expression by the end (it ends with a bomb threat being called in at the premier of the movie and Modine refuses to leave). A movie like The Passion Of The Christ, which isn't good, along with the motivation behind it is gonna bring things outta people whether they like it or think it’s stupid. Given that Abel Ferrara is clearly a strong Catholic, I imagine he felt the need to make this. What I’m about to say is going to make no sense but this is his most flawed film yet at the same time one of his best films since The Funeral (a criminally underrated mob film featuring Chris Penn in his greatest performance). This is a long overdue write-up (which explains why it’s a bit long). If you remember my review of Go-Go Tales from early 2011, Anthology Film Archives did a great retrospective on Abel Ferrara’s work from the last decade, which were films that most Americans had yet to see. I’d say Mary was the best out of the bunch.



247086_TV episodes & movies instantly streaming from Netflix. Start your FREE trial!

Friday, April 20, 2012

FEAR, ANXIETY & DEPRESSION

Not every good director makes a solid debut. For some it takes a couple of tries. Stanley Kubrick had 'Fear & Desire' AND 'Killers Kiss' (sorry but that movie isn't very good. just admit it. I know it's Kubrick, but just admit it). And not every great director owns up to or acknowledges everything they've done either (just look at David Lynch and 'Dune'). Todd Solondz's feature film debut 'Fear Anxiety & Depression' - a Woody Allen-esque comedy starring Solondz himself - fits the criteria of both. It is a failed debut that he not only disowns, but supposedly wont talk about in interviews. In fact, when I walked past Todd Solondz in 2006 and told him i owned a copy of 'Fear, Anxiety & Depression' he covered his face as if he were embarrassed and said: "Oh god, WHY?" (True story). But as the years go on, Solondz's feature debut has become one of the last works to truly be called "rare" (bad or not). The VHS is out of print and there isn't even a bootleg or multi-region copy of it on DVD. At no fault of Todd Solondz, many people were kind of led to believe that 'Welcome To The Dollhouse' (1996) was his directorial debut in the same way many some people thought 'Stranger Than Paradise' was Jim Jarmusch's directorial debut (after 'Fear, Anxiety & Depression' was released he stopped directing and became an ESL teacher for adults, which is something that morked its way in to the plot of Happiness). Even indie gems without a real DVD release like Hal Hartley's 'Trust' and Tom Noonan's 'What Happened Was...' can be watched on Netflix.
There aren't too many movies in my collection that I consider to be a "prized possession" outside of my 'Love Streams' VHS and the original DVD box set of 'Eraserhead' that you had to buy off of David Lynch's website back in the day. But 'Fear Anxiety & Depression is among one of my rare gems (mostly in part because I am a big fan of his. I imagine casual fans of Solondz's work really would care about own a VHS of Fear, Anxiety & Depression). It's easy for a low budget studio screwball comedy to get swallowed up and forgotten about in an intimidating year like 1989. It was the year when American indie heavyweights like Jim Jarmusch, Spike Lee & a pre-Good Will Hunting Gus Van Sant shared the spotlight with the likes of Tim Burton (whose revamping of the Batman franchise still influences the Batman movies of today) as well as international directors like John Woo & Michael Haneke. 1989 was also the year of some very important directorial debuts: Michael Haneke ('The Seventh Continent'), Hal Hartley ('Unbelievable Truth'), Steven Soderbergh ('Sex, Lies & Videotape') and Wendall B. Harris ('Chameleon Street'), Cult films (with plenty of dark humor) like; 'Heatthers', 'How To Get Ahead In Advertising', 'Society', 'The Cook, The Thief, The Wife & His Lover' & 'Parents', blockbuster sequels ('Back To The Future', 'Ghostbusters' and 'Lethal Weapon') and more independent films getting mainstream recognition and acclaim ('Do The Right Thing', 'Mystery Train' & 'Sex, Lies & Videotape'). What was also important about 1989 was that it paved the way for new, young independent American filmmakers of the 90's like; Todd Haynes, Quentin Tarantino, Kevin Smith and many many more.
'Fear, Anxiety & Depression' is essentially 'Manhattan' or 'Annie Hall' meets the screwball comedy stylings of 'Weekend At Bernies'. That's not the most flattering description but its also not the greatest movie in the world either. But it's also not as bad as the people who've seen it make it out to be. And the more Solondz distances himself from this movie the more curious people get about it.





Fear anxiety & depression is the story of "Ira" - a struggling (and somewhat pretentious) playwright looking for romance in New York City. Much like Woody Allen does in his own movies when he plays the main character, Ira/Solondz moves through a few different women through the course of the film. The women in his life include: "Sharon" - Ira's strange yet loving girlfriend who he's really only with out of convenience. Next is "Junk" - a performance artist who kind of symbolizes pretentious modern New York City art of the 80's (Ira is head over heels for Junk but she cant stand him). Last is "Janice" - a wholesome, nice waitress/struggling actress who used to date Ira's best friend "Jack" - another modern artist who ends up dating Junk. As you can tell from the description of these characters, this film is about more than just romance and relationships in New York City. It's also about struggling artists trying to "make it big". This doesn't sound like the worst movie in the world, but the attempts at humor are SO screwball and cheesy at times that it makes you want to cringe and look away (especially knowing what Solondz went on to direct in the 90's and today). And, as you can tell from my description, the movie is filled to the brim with cliches.
The film's positive aspects are the few moments of dark humor along with Stanley Tucci's early performance as Ira's rival playwright. But outside of the few moments of dark humor and the bleak (yet comedic) outlook on life, the Todd Solondz responsible for stuff like 'Happiness' and 'Welcome To The Dollhouse' hadn't developed yet. In his defense this was a studio film that he had no control over as far as editing went. Apparently once shooting wrapped he had nothing to do with the cutting of the film (although I cant imagine how any kind of editing could have saved this). When 'Life During Wartime' came out a few years back people made this big deal about how it was Solondz's first movie without pedophilia, rape or all the other dark subjects his films are known for. But true Solondz fans who've seen his first film know that really isn't the case at all. This isn't exactly a "no-wave" film as that scene had died out in NYC by the late 80's, but there's still traces of it in 'Fear, Anxiety & Depression' (the films east/west village setting, the references to modern art, etc). And outside of Woody Allen, Solondz also drew inspiration from other works like 'Liquid Sky' and Scorsese's 'After Hours' & 'King Of Comedy' (there's even a scene when Ira is being chased by Sharon that's very similar to the scene in 'King Of Comedy' when Jerry Lewis is being chased by Sandra Bernhard).
As unappealing as this movie may seem to some, you have to admit that it does sound a bit intriguing. If you're a diehard fan of Todd Solondz, like me, this is something you need to see in order to complete the Solondz filmography.

Monday, March 5, 2012

WILL THESE MOVIES EVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY?: 10 RARITIES THAT NEED TO BE RELEASED ON DVD

'Joe's Bedstuy Barbershop: We Cut Heads' (Spike Lee)
Most of us are aware of popular cult films like Donnie Darko & Christmas On Mars or the DVD release of Alejnadro Jodorowsky's work that took forever to come out due to legal issues, being shelved, or sensitive subject matter. But at the end of the day...they finally got released no matter how long it took. There's still quite a few films out there from prominent directors that almost no one has seen (outside of festivals, special screening or bootlegs). And I'm not talking about unfinished movies in limbo, production hell or development hell. I'm talking about movies that have been shot, wrapped and edited yet haven't been released to the general public. With the growing popularity of region 2 DVD's, Eclipse box sets (the criterion collection's sub label that focuses on releasing rarely seen works from important contemporary & classic directors) and theaters like The Museum Of The Moving Image & Anthology Film Archives we're seeing more and more stuff that we thought we'd never see come out on the big screen and on DVD. But there's still plenty more movies that the public (especially dedicated movie nerds like myself) want to see.

'Fight Harm' (Harmony Korine)
So I've selected 10 movies (some of which I've actually had the pleasure of seeing...yes I'm bragging) and broken them up in to 3 categories:

"Who The F*ck Knows" - Movies that pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being released on DVD

"Possibly" - Realistic possibilities. I think the people at the criterion collection should pay close attention to these

"Probably Not" - These will more than likely either never see the light of day or be released on DVD










WHO THE F*CK KNOWS?:

-PROMISES WRITTEN IN WATER (Vincent Gallo)
After screening this at Toronto and Venice, Vincent Gallo suddenly released the following statement regarding his recent film about a man taking care of his terminally ill girlfriend in her final days:
I do not want my new works to be generated in a market or audience of any kind
I'm seriously hoping this is just another publicity stunt/desperate attempt to get attention from PINNLAND EMPIRE favorite-Vincent Gallo. Or maybe due to all the piling hate over the years that the last few movies he's been involved in has received ('The Brown Bunny', 'Tetro', 'Moscow Rising', etc), he's being serious and doesn't wanna deal with all the negativity and hate anymore.

-WANG DANG (Tom Noonan)
I put this in the "who the f*ck knows category" because on some level there has to be a demand for something to get released no matter how obscure or underground it is. Tom Noonan is one of the best characters actors around as well as an underrated director, but he's not exactly a household name. Outside of some film school students and Tom Noonan himself, I don't even think people know this movie exists. The plot sounds great though: A has-been movie director comes to a film school to speak to a class of film students and he eventually gets caught up in an adventure with two grad students.

-LANTON MILLS (Terrence Malick)
Apparently the only way you can view this movie is to schedule an appointment at the A.F.I., who own the only existing copy of Terrence Malick's first movie, for research purposes only. Seriously? Why should anyone have to go through all that just to watch a movie? With the recent popularity of 'Tree Of Life' and the anticipation of his next three movies (which he seems to be working on all at the same time), I'm hoping this will get some kind of attention.

-SCENES FROM FIGHT HARM (Harmony Korine)
You seriously mean to tell me Harmony Korine got the shit beat out of him for NOTHING? This documentary about Harmony Korine trying to provoke fights with random strangers on the street never got released because apparently the footage (shot by his friend David Blaine...yes THAT David Blaine) was unusable. I'm sorry but if I got two concussions and other various injuries for the sake of my film (no matter how stupid it may be) I'm showing it to people now matter how shitty the camerawork is.

'Fraulein: A German Melodrama' (Michael Haneke)


POSSIBLY:


-KEEP IT FOR YOURSELF (Claire Denis)
Here's another rare one starring Vincent Gallo directed by Claire Denis (who's no stranger to rare films herself with stuff like 'U.S. Go Home' and her early/rarely seen documentaries). Given Claire Denis' recent popularity in the indie/art house world these days you'd think this lil gem (which i keep reading about in all the literature i find on her) would make a great special feature on a DVD. And while we're at it, I'd like to see 'U.S. Go Home' & 'No Fear No Die' put out as well.

-JOE'S BEDSTUY BARBERSHOP: WE CUT HEADS (Spike Lee)
New York Directors like Scorsese and Jim Jarmusch have been getting their early/amateur/student works released in the last few years so I think its time for Spike Lee. This short is also a nice little artifact in that not only was it the starting point for Spike Lee, but Ang Lee as well (he was a production assistant on the movie).

-MICHAEL HANEKE'S MADE FOR T.V. MOVIES
Think how awesome this box set would be! Either criterion or kino (who's released a few of his films already) needs to get on this.


-THE EARLY SHORT FILMS OF HAL HARTLEY
Much like Spike Lee, here's another staple in the NYC indie film scene that needs to have his early work put out. To me, this is highly likely since there's already been two collections of shorts by Hal Hartley released already.

'Cremaster Cycle' (Matthew Barney)

PROBABLY NOT:


-A GAME IN THE SAND (Werner Herzog)
When asked if 'A Game In The Sand', an early short film about two little kids and a chicken in a sandbox directed by Werner Herzog that, according to him, Got Out Of Hand, would ever be shown in theaters or released on DVD he said; Not While I'm Alive. I guess that answers that. Moving on...

-THE FILMS OF MATTHEW BARNEY
These aren't the most rare movies in the world, but they still only pop up every once in a while at a theater like The IFC Center or The MOMA. Not everyone lives in New York City, San Francisco or Japan. There's people in this world with good taste who live in the middle of nowhere that cant make it out to a retrospective or a special screening at the MOMA for Matthew Barney's movies which he considers to be unique works of art (like his sculptures) and wont mass produce them on DVD because it cheapens their value. Listen DICK, just put the movies on DVD already!

Thursday, September 1, 2011

THE RARE TV SHOWS OF DAVID LYNCH: ON THE AIR & HOTEL ROOM

ON THE AIR
To kind of piggy back off of my recent 'Road To Nowhere' blog entry that made me the talk of Monte Hellman's facebook page for an entire day, I'm writing about a failed project from one of my all time favorite directors. As a true fan of David Lynch I'm willing to admit that his often forgotten about 2nd attempt at television (after the short yet extremely popular cultural phenomena known as Twin Peaks) was a failure. Such a failure that when i mention 'On The Air' to people, they look at me like I'm crazy. One of my friends was certain that i was making this show up until i showed him the actual VHS tape of 'On The Air' (one of my most prized possessions) as proof that it existed. Even some people who claim to be "REAL" David Lynch fans (which just about anyone who's seen eraserhead twice claims to be), don't even know about 'On The Air'. But after watching a few episodes you can kinda see why it didn't last. Only a hardcore David Lynch fan that's in denial can admit that this was good. Yet at the same time...i find myself watching an episode or 2 once a year.
This short lived television series that only lasted for 7 episodes on ABC, which David Lynch created, produced and directed (well, he directed episode one at least) was about a 1950's television studio that aired the live sitcom; 'The Lester Guy Show'. Every episode some wacky disaster behind the camera would happen while the show was airing, and the characters would spend the rest of the episode trying to rectify the situation in order to save the show. The main characters included...

"Lester Guy" - a has-been/egocentric actor and star of the "Lester Guy Show" 
"Betty Hudson" - an incredibly stupid, yet sweet actress who becomes popular over night by accident. Lester Guy spends most of his time trying to sabotage her only to have it backfire in his face.
"Bud Budwaller" - the mean TV executive (actually Miguel Ferrer, an underrated character actor, did a really great job in a performance that was reminiscent of his more recognizable roles as the "unlikeable guy" in 'Robcop' and 'Twin Peaks').
"Vadja Gochktch" - director of the lester guy show that speaks his own language that no one can understand but his assistant "Ruth Trueworthy" 
This show may not have been all that good, but it still had many of Lynch's signatures. It had a similar vibe to Twin Peaks. The show, taking place in the 1950's, continued Lynch's fascination with that era. And along with a few re-used actors from twin peaks, there were plenty of David Lynch "regulars" involved in the show on & off camera: Miguel Ferrer (twin peaks & fire walk with me), Mark Frost (twin peaks), Jack Fisk (the straight story, mulholland drive), Deepak Nayer (lost highway, fire walk with me).
Its kinda sad that my first blog entry on the films of one of my favorite directors is about one of his biggest failures. Twin Peaks may not have lasted very long, but it still holds its place in television history, has a cult following and spawned an underrated film that was nominated for best picture at Cannes. Even his other "failed" television attempt turned in to one of the greatest movies of the last decade (mulholland drive). 'On The Air' tried too hard to be satirical and slapstick and it just ended up falling flat. Sorry, David. I still love you though. If curiosity gets the best of you, a few episodes of On The Air are on youtube. But unless you LOVE David Lynch, chances are you wont dig it.



HOTEL ROOM
'Straight Story' aside, the 1990's were not kind to David Lynch. His name was still more than relevant and he was very active, but everything he did seemed to be tainted with some kind of negativity. Twin Peaks was cancelled after 2 seasons. The show lost its steam once Laura Palmer's killer was discovered mid-season. The whole mystique of the show was "Who Killed Laura Palmer?". Once that mystery was discovered there was no point to watch the show anymore. Sure the show featured many great characters, which is what Lynch tried to expand upon, but at the end of the day it was all about Laura Palmer. The Lynch won best picture at Cannes (wild at heart) but was boo'ed by the audience upon receiving the award. You just read about 'On The Air' and its cancellation after 7 episodes and the most popular criticism of his much hyped 'Lost Highway' was a negative one...

The underrated made for cable television 'Hotel Room' always seems to fall between the cracks and go unmentioned. Unlike 'On The Air', this short lived mini-series was great and it featured a few David Lynch regulars like Harry Dean Stanton, Alica Witt, Crispin Glover and Barry Gifford. The premise of the show was about a series of events that went down in the same new york city hotel room (room 603) at different time periods. The vibe of 'Hotel Room' still features Lynch's signature quirkiness and oddball sense of humor mixed with a slightly more serious tone. If you're a fan of Twin Peaks, 'Are You Afraid Of The Dark' and 'The Shining', chances are you'll enjoy 'Hotel Room'. Each episode featured new actors, with the maid and the bellboy being the only 2 recurring characters in all 3 episodes...

EPISODE 1: TRICKS
Moe (played by David Lynch regular Harry Dean Stanton) and his friend Lou take a hooker back to room 603 for a fun time, but things turn dark. Instead of jumping right away in to sex, the characters confess personal stories about themselves to one another. Eventually Lou starts to get weird & violent and scares the hooker away. Then Moe & Lou's friendship is put to the test. This is by far my favorite story of the 3. Its interesting that Lynch takes a pretty cliche story (2 guys take a hooker back to a hotel room and things get dark), yet he still manages to make it interesting.

EPISODE 2: GETTING RID OF ROBERT
A stuck up gold digger (Sasha) and her friends (one of whom is played by a pre-law & order Mariska Hartigay) sit around room 603 talking about whether or not she should marry her wealthy boyfriend Robert (Griffin Dunne). Things take a dark turn when Robert arrives. An argument ensues between him & Sasha, and after he calls her a cunt she hits him over the head with something and seriously injures him.

EPISODE 3: BLACKOUT
In this story, a married couple (played by Crispin Glover and Alica Witt) sit through a major power outage and as the story unfolds, we learn that the wife is mentally unstable due to the loss of their child a few years ago. 

Nowadays more and more movie directors have switched over to television: Todd Haynes (mildred pierce), Spike Lee (directed the pilot for 'Shark'), Michael Mann (Luck), Martin Scorsese (boardwalk empire) and John Cameron Mitchell's upcoming HBO series.
'Tricks' is also available on youtube in 2 parts.

Friday, May 6, 2011

RARE FILMS OF CLAIRE DENIS: U.S. GO HOME & NO FEAR, NO DIE

U.S. GO HOME
'No Fear, No Die' and 'U.S. Go Home' (which i actually had seen before, but had been dying to see again for years) are the only 2 films of Denis' that aren't available on DVD, probably due to a music rights issue. The soundtrack to 'U.S. Go Home', featuring everyone from ska artist Prince Buster to Nico and The Rolling Stones, is one of the most memorable things about the film, along with Vincent Gallo's show stealing appearance at the end as well as Gregoire Colin's dance scene, which almost feels like an homage to Chris Parker's dance in Jim Jarmusch's 'Permanent Vacation' (Denis worked as an assistant director to Jarmusch in the 80's). In 'U.S. Go Home', two teenage girls; Martine (Alice Houri) & Marlene (Jessica Tharaud) plan to lose their virginity at a party, but need Martine's older brother Alain (Gregoire Colin) to take them, or else their parents wont let them go. Naturally he's defiant at first but he eventually comes around. When they finally get to the party Martine has an uncomfortable encounter with an older man who tries to have sex with her. This causes her to ditch the party, leaving her brother and Marlene behind who eventually have an awkward sexual experience with each other later on. After Martine leaves the party she's picked up by an American soldier (played by Vincent Gallo). Once again Gallo plays "himself" like he does in any other movie. But its so hilarious because he comes off SO American, especially when surrounded by a bunch of Parisians. He's awful at the pronunciation of french names (he pronounces 'Alain' as "ALLEN" in that overly American sounding buffalo new york accent of his) and the scene where he offers Martine and her brother coca cola is clearly some kind of a metaphor for Gallo's "American-ness". Eventually, Martine and the Soldier go off in to the woods and its clearly implied that they have sex. As a huge fan of  Denis, i really loved the last 10 minutes or so of 'U.S. Go Home' (which includes the scene where Martine and the soldier go off in to the woods). In 1994, Denis was still a fairly new director, and hadn't completely developed her unique style that we're familiar with today. One of Denis' strengths as a director is her ability to quickly or casually hint at things, which is what the last 10 minutes of 'U.S. Go Home' does. At the end of the film, in a scene which is very similar to a scene in '35 Shots of Rum', we see the 3 teenagers silently waiting for the bus, not speaking to one another, yet so many things are made obvious. The scene leaves us wondering what the relationship will be like between Martine and her brother, as well as the relationship with her friend Marlene, now that she's had sex with Alain. And in another scene where the soldier and Martine are about to part ways, probably never to see each other again, their body language and the way they look at each other says so much. Even though this coming-of-age teenage tale is almost like an "anti-john hughes" film, you can still enjoy 'U.S. Go Home' whether or not you're a fan of stuff like 'the breakfast club' or 'pretty in pink'. At the end of the day, they all deal with the same issues: The awkwardness of growing up, losing your virginity, having a crush on someone, etc. Denis just approaches those issues slightly differently.
'U.S. Go Home' was part of a french tv series called; 'Tous les garçons et les filles de leur âge', in which various directors (including Olivier Assayas and Chantal Ackerman) had to make a semi-autobiographical film about their teenager years. The one stipulation that all the directors had to follow was that each film had to have a party scene. On a side note, Denis and Olivier Assayas went on to collaborate on the idea of what would eventually become 'Irma Vep'. I can only imagine how great the other films in this series came out, especially from the likes of Ackerman and Assayas.
Anyone who likes Denis' other movies will love this. I guarantee it. It features 2 of her most commonly used actors (Colin and Houri). Any film that features Alice Houri, an actress that i constantly bug on facebook (and she actually responds to my comments) is always a plus for me. Plus Colin and Houri playing brother & sister felt like a prequel to what's considered one of Denis's most popular films; 'Nenette & Boni' (the film that followed 'U.S. Go Home', which co-stars Vincent Gallo as well), in which Alice Houri plays a pregnant teenager who runs away to live with her estranged older brother, played by Colin. With all the attention Denis is getting these days (she's considered to be one of the best directors working right now), i really hope someone like criterion can get the music rights for this film taken care of so it can see a proper dvd release.

George Colin in one of the most memorable scenes of 'U.S. Go Home', which felt very similar to Jim Jarmusch's 'Permanent Vacation'. Also, the way Colin lets himself go is also very reminiscent of the scene in 'Nenette and Boni' where he imagines himself having sex with Vincent Gallo's wife...

Dancing scene from 'Permanent Vacation'

NO FEAR, NO DIE
Switching to a more serious tone, Denis' 2nd film, which i also believe has been held up and rarely shown these days due to music rights issues as well, deals with another trademark of hers: The exploration of black people (often from Africa) living in France, which she continued to focus on in 'I cant Sleep' and '35 Shots of Rum'. Alex Descas and Isaach De Bankole (who are essentially her "Deniro & Keitel") play 2 immigrant cock fighters; "Jocelyn" (Descas) & "Doh" (Debankole) from the Caribbean and Africa, respectively. Jocelyn's talent lies in the training of the roosters, while Doh is more business savvy and is better at setting up matches and handling money. Things slowly get out of hand when a love triangle develops between the wife of the head of the cock fighting ring, his son and Jocelyn, who in particular seems to be falling in to a deep depression due to how much in love he is with the bosses wife. In fact, of all the roosters he trains, there's one white rooster in particular that he takes extra special care of and pays more attention too, who is clearly meant to represent the bosses wife that he knows he can never have. Denis' first 3 films all share a connection with one another. In her first film; 'Chocolat', we see an African (played by Issach Debankole) living in Cameroon in the final days of colonialism. Her next film; 'No Fear, No Die', we see 2 immigrants, one of which is played by Debankole again, who appear to be "fresh off the boat", and adjusting to life in France, and in her third film, we see an African family (made up of mostly immigrant) who appear to have been settled in France for a few years.
Alex Descas gives not only one of the top 3 performances in a Claire Denis film (the other 2 being; Denis Lavant in 'Beau Travail' and Michel Subor in 'The Intruder'),  but he gives the best performance of his career. He's almost always reserved, calm and laid back in just about anything he's ever acted in, but not so much in this. Sometimes i feel like Claire Denis and Olivier Assayas are the only 2 directors that recognize his talent. His performance in the last half of 'No Fear, No Die' alone is worth watching the movie. Whats sucks is that this film is so rarely shown or talked about in this country, that i don't really have much to back up what I'm saying. There's not even a clip of the film on youtube. Although if it means anything, Descas was nominated for a Cesar award.
The cock fighting scenes may be hard to stomach for some, especially if you're an animal lover. The end of the film features a fight between 2 roosters with razors tied to their feet. But according to the text that comes up just before the ending credits, "no animals were harmed during the making of the film". I find this a little hard to believe, because it looked so real. Along with the theme of immigrants living in France, Denis continues to explore interracial relationships. I'm sure anyone who's a fan of Denis knows that in any of her films where Alex Descas has a major role, he's always paired with a white wife, girlfriend or love interest (35 shots of rum, trouble every day, i cant sleep and no fear no die). Even the few films that don't feature Alex Descas still show some kind of black/white relationship. In 'beau travail' denis lavant has an African girlfriend. In 'white material', its heavily hinted that Isabelle Hupert's character has had an affair with one of the local government officials. However, instead of showing how "taboo" it is for a black man to be with a white woman, or making the interracial relationship the "issue" of the film, she presents the relationships the same way that Fasbinder presented homosexuality in his films, which is essentially showing homosexuality (or in Denis' case, interracial romance) in the same light as a "straight" relationship between a (white) man and (white) a woman.

Descas & Beatrice Dalle in 'I Cant Sleep'

 Descas and Dalle (again) in 'Trouble Every Day'

Richard Courcet in 'I Cant Sleep'

Gregoire Colin and Mati Diop (who plays Alex Descas' daughter from an interracial relationship) in '35 Shots of Rum'

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...