Showing posts with label austrian cinema. Show all posts
Showing posts with label austrian cinema. Show all posts

Friday, February 11, 2022

THE SCHOOL OF CHANTAL AKERMAN: MICHAEL HANEKE - PART 3

 

The Seventh Continent / Michael


Former Haneke collaborator Markus Schleinzer owes a bit to Haneke when it comes to style (see above). But that style also comes by way of Chantal Akerman…

For Michael I chose a way of storytelling that is often used by Haneke as well but he hasn´t invented it. You can find it as well with Chantal Akerman - Markus Schleinzer, Indiewire.com


Jeanne Dielmann / 71 Fragments... / Michael


We even looked at the coincidental influence and visual similarities between the work of Akerman & Haneke so it only makes sense that his unofficial “protégé” should have his share of Akerman-isms as well.

Below are some visual similarities between the feature films of Haneke & Schleinzer by way of Chantal Akerman.

Enjoy…

The Seventh Continent / Michael

The Seventh Continent /
Michael

The Seventh Continent /
Michael

The Seventh Continent / Michael

The Seventh Continent / Michael

The Seventh Continent / Michael

The Seventh Continent /
Michael

The Seventh Continent /
Michael

The Seventh Continent /
Michael

The Seventh Continent /
Michael


 

Friday, November 9, 2018

THE SCHOOL OF CHANTAL AKERMAN PART 5: THE INFLUENCE ON MICHAEL HANEKE CONTINUED...


This exploration in to the visual & (sometimes) thematic similarities between the films of Chantal Akerman & Michael Haneke is a little different from part one (click here to view part one).
Instead of chopping up 2-4 seconds out of a particular scene, I went with 10-12 second long (unbroken) takes to hammer home my theory/belief that Akerman had some kind of subconscious influence on Haneke. And if not that, their films are still similar in terms of; ambiance (both directors explore the sometimes cold ambiance of Europe), color palettes (grays, blacks, dark blues, browns, etc), themes (depression & loneliness) and framing (you'll notice half of the comparisons below are centered)

I know at first glance some of these may seem vague. There's lots of movies with scenes of people sitting in the back of a car or moving around in their kitchen. You're someone who isn't in to slightly abstract thoughts and/or comparisons, perhaps some Kurosawa/Star Wars comparisons are more fitting for you.

enjoy...


Les Rendezvous D'Anna /
The Seventh Continent

Les Rendezvous D'Anna /
The Piano Teacher

Les Rendezvous D'Anna /
The Piano Teacher

Saute Ma Ville /
The Piano Teacher

Saute Ma Ville /
The Piano Teacher

Saute Ma Ville /
Funny Games

Saute Ma Ville /
Funny Games

La Folie Almayer /
Happy End

Toute Une Nuit / The Piano Teacher 

Toute Une Nuit / Code Unknown


And as a bonus, see how Akerman influenced even younger filmmakers like Markus Schlienzer (far right) through Haneke (middle).
For those that don't know, Schlienzer worked with/for Haneke during his Austrian period...
Jeanne Dielman.../71 Fragments/Michael 

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

THE SCHOOL OF CHANTAL AKERMAN PART 2: MICHAEL HANEKE

While Michael Haneke hasn't gone on record to mention Chantal Akerman as an influence on his work (he has cited the likes of Bresson, Pasolini, Tarkovsky, etc), the beautifully (sometimes) monotonous tone and overall ice cold ambiance (found in his early Austrian films) do share some similarities to the films of Chantal Akerman.
Below are some of my favorite examples of the (possible) influence that Akerman may have had on Haneke along with a few quotes from various critics connecting both filmmakers.

enjoy...



The film’s basic form—the mechanical repetition of everyday tasks leading to breakdown—is borrowed from Chantal Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles - Jason Bellamy on Haneke’s The Seventh Continent  


Though her legacy is inextricably linked to “Jeanne Dielman,” perhaps one of the three or four most important feminist texts ever produced in the medium, it was Akerman’s versatility that seems most impressive in retrospect. Who but a chameleonic, endlessly curious artist would be cited as an influence by the likes of Todd Haynes, Sally Potter, Michael Haneke, Gus Van Sant, and Tsai Ming-liang? - Sam Adams


Chief among such pictures is his first feature, Die Siebente Kontinent (The Seventh Continent, 1989)—one of the purest modernist texts since the height of Resnais and Antonioni, and perhaps the greatest contemporary contribution to what may be termed "the cinema of existentialism": the focus on the actions and morality of individuals in a seemingly empty universe found in the work of film-makers like Chantal Akerman - Adam Bingham


In Haneke's The Seventh Continent (right) we see the same dreary driving moment from Les Rendezvous D'Anna right down to the same empty/depressed look on the faces of the actresses in their respective films (middle panels)...
Les Rendezvous D'Anna / The Seventh Continent

Les Rendezvous D'Anna / The Piano Teacher

News From Home / Code Unknown
Obviously Chantal Akerman didn't invent the long-take tracking shot but given all the coincidences between Akerman's films & Haneke's films, it isn't that much of a reach to think Haneke drew some possible subconscious inspiration...
Les Rendezvous D'Anna
The Castle
Code Unknown
The Piano Teacher
Similar elevator shots...
Je Tu Il Elle /
Cache
The monotonous & lonely dinner routine...
Saute Ma Ville / 71 Fragments...

Saute Ma Ville /
71 Fragments
The monotony of the morning routine...
 La Chambre / The Seventh Continent 

Much like the tracking shot from Les Rendezvous D'Anna, Chantal Akerman was hardly the first to explore the idea of characters communicating through gadgets like ipads, iphones & laptops. But the way people communicate in Haneke's Happy End (2017) reminds me of Akerman's No Home Movie (2015)...
No Home Movie / Happy End

Both characters on the left request their "significant other" (on the right) to preform a task as a way of showing their dominance
Les Rendezvous D'Anna / The Piano Teacher


Wednesday, March 11, 2015

HANEKE & DENIS


I really shouldn't have sat on this for as long as I did (over18 months?). I should have released this during the period after Amour/before Bastards, but whatever...the work is done. Enjoy...

In my opinion Michael Haneke & Claire Denis are the two best active filmmakers on the planet and have been for quite some time. Cinema may not be as fresh & exciting as it was 40-something years ago but we're still living in an exciting time where some of the best films are coming out and these two filmmakers are behind a good portion of 'em. I don’t even think anyone else really comes close besides Oliver Assayas & Mike Leigh.
Now...there's a fairly legitimate argument in questioning Haneke & Denis' status in the world of cinema when their films may not have the same popularity due to limited runs in smaller theaters (especially in America). Both Haneke & Denis' films aren’t as accessible as other current popular filmmakers like Christopher Nolan, Kathryn Bigelow, Quentin Tarantino, Darren Aronofsky, James Cameron, Scorsese, etc. How can you convince someone who just got finished watching Django Unchained that he/she needs to watch Code Unknown or Cache (two films that focus on racial & multicultural issues in this world better than anything I can think of) or someone who just finished watching Zero Dark Thirty that they should watch Beau Travail? You really can’t. But that doesn’t change the fact that both Haneke & Denis put out films that are more progressive (in terms of plot & filmmaking styles) than just about anything I can think of.

While most modern filmmakers today casually graze over issues like globalization, female sexuality, desencitization among youth, racial tension & the negative effect of the media, Denis & Haneke go a bit deeper (sometimes without needing much dialogue). Plus, and most importantly, they aren’t trying to solve these issues or put bandaids on things like Paul Haggis tried with Crash or Tyler Perry does with some of his work. Some of the best performances of the last 15+ years have come from their work (Isabelle Hupert in The Piano Teacher, Denis Lavant in Beau Travail, both Emanuelle Riva & Jean-Louis Trintigant in Amour, etc). And even though both filmmakers are Europeans, the themes & subject matter in their work is universal - The racial tension in Cache or Code Unknown applies to America. The subject of growing multinational countries & immigration isn’t just something that affects Europe. The stereotype of the absentee black father in America could easily be shattered by Alex Descas' performance in 35 Shots Of Rum as his character is very real and reminds me not only of my own father who was around, but plenty of other black fathers who either don’t get recognized or are ignored due the constant negative expectation that many people have towards black males when it comes to handling the responsibility of fatherhood.
Race is an important, sensitive, touchy & sometimes ignored issue in this world and has been for a while (and not just the relationship between black people & white people which seems to be the only lane filmmakers wanna explore when it comes to that). Haneke & Denis have been exploring race better than any director I can think of since Spike Lee released Bamboozled. The limited accessibility of their work means very little to me. Haneke & Denis' work is much too important & relevant to be disregarded simply because they're films don’t play at an AMC or get coverage in Entertainment Weekly. And with the growing number of indie & foreign films popping up on Hulu & Netflix along with the continued popularity of magazines like Film Comment, it’s become easier to discover films outside of mainstream cinema.
35 Shots Of Rum (Claire Denis)
I know some may think it’s pointless to determine who the "best" is (especially when I'm sure neither filmmaker cares) but it’s just my indescribable fascination to determine who the best is at something. Art house & independent cinema try to act like competition & awards are pointless. A lot of this has to do with older legends like Werner Herzog & Tarkofsky dismissing awards and/or giving great quotes like; "Awards are for dogs & ponies" (Herzog). There's this vibe I get that awards are beneath some filmmakers yet these art house & indie filmmakers rarely (or ever) turn down these "silly" awards that are supposedly beneath them (Herzog included). Sometimes I get the feeling that Cannes & Sundance are more competitive than the Oscars. So many feelings have been caught and so many beefs have been started over not getting awards or recognition at those festivals - Spike Lee's Do The Right Thing losing out to Sex, Lies & Videotape at Cannes in '89 and Lee subsequently threatening Wim Wenders with a bat, Von Trier flipping off Roman Polanski (head of the Cannes jury in '91) because Europa didn’t win best picture, Vincent Gallo getting snubbed by Paul Schrader at Sundance, etc. But being labeled the best can have some importance to it. It’s not just all about an award or a golden statue. Determining who's films best represents this world (while still giving credit to other important filmmakers at the same time) is an important honor in my opinion.

So...between Haneke & Denis, who's the best? Technically, if these two filmmakers were to be ranked, Haneke would easily be #1. Mainstream cinema has come to accept his (uncompromised) work more & more. The White Ribbon won a Golden Globe, Amour has dominated this year's Oscar nomination and his remake of Funny Games saw him working with more popular/mainstream actors like Tim Roth & Naomi Watts.
Isabelle Hupert in The Piano Teacher (Haneke) & White Material (Denis)

When you compare Haneke's work to Denis' (coincidentally, both filmmakers usually release films around the same time or within a year of each other) Haneke kinda wins hands down. Here's how I score their films next to each other...

The Seventh Continent vs. Chocolat
Benny's Video vs. No Fear, No Die (tie)
71 Fragments vs. I Can’t Sleep (barely)
The Castle vs. US Go Home*
Funny Games vs. Nenette & Boni
Code Unknown vs. Beau Travail
The Piano Teacher vs. Trouble Everyday
The Time Of The Wolf vs. Friday Night
Cache vs. The Intruder
Funny Games US vs. 35 Shots Of Rum
The White Ribbon vs. White Material
Amour vs. Bastards (tie)

* both have done quite a few made for tv movies in their countries but the Castle (Haneke) & US Go Home (Denis) are their two most known & accessible tv works so I’m putting them up against each other

racial tension in Code Unknown (Haneke) & No Fear No Die (Denis)

Although Haneke has more "wins", there is a more spiritual & soulful side to Denis. Don’t get me wrong, there's a gritty reality to Denis' films (No Fear No Die, US Go Home, I Can’t Sleep) but she also provides an escape. Films like The Intruder & the dreamy moments in Nenette & Boni provide an escape to a subconscious world. Haneke's work does occasionally explore dreams (or nightmares depending on how you look at it) but Denis is a bit more versed in stream of consciousness & dreaminess in my opinion. There's something about giving Haneke alone the title of "BEST" that bothers me. I don’t know if I want such cold, dark & biter work (The Piano Teacher, Cache, The White Ribbon, etc) to be the defining films of this era. Haneke is almost perfect but there isn’t a lot of hope in his films. Think about the final moments of The Time Of The Wolf or The Piano Teacher and tell me you feel any hope for humanity. Actually, Amour, Haneke's latest film, is really the only thing of his that says he has a heart. Say what you want about Claire Denis, who also happens to be versed in documentary filmmaking, but there’s a bit more hope in her work and you don’t feel like slitting your wrists or falling in to a mild depression after watching her films. I can be a cynic but I still have hope for this world. Influence and the impact a filmmaker has on cinema is also an important factor. Both filmmakers bring influences from an older generation in a much more subtle way than Tarantino or Refn yet still have original & influential styles. Some may not realize it but when watching The Seventh Continent, The White Ribbon, Beau Travail or 35 Shots Of Rum, viewers are being exposed to the filmmaking styles of Bresson, Dryer, Godard & Ozu. Furthermore, many modern French films & filmmakers are very reminiscent of Claire Denis (Gregory Colin, one of her regular actors, has gone on to become a director who's style is very similar to Denis'). Recent films like Michael, Afterschool and Dogtooth all borrow heavily from Haneke in terms of style & atmosphere.
The White Ribbon (Haneke)
Getting back to race for a moment - although both filmmakers are white Europeans, they're exploration of different races & ethnicities seems more genuine than most filmmakers (even those of color). There’s been a growing trend among many white filmmakers in the last decade where they like to explore cultures (mostly black) other than their own. The problem is that a lot of these films come off bad and/or bordering on being racist or perpetuating stereotypes (by accident, but still). The different cultures, races & ethnicities in Haneke & Denis' films don’t come off like studied entities from an uneducated or misguided white person viewing from a distance. In Denis' case this has to do with her growing up all throughout the continent of Africa and being exposed to different cultures & nationalities. Although the two filmmakers I feel are the “best” right now happen to be white, they don’t just explore “white” issues or make stories that are "white only" (especially Denis). Not many prominent filmmakers can say that. Where Haneke "beats" Denis in terms of recognition (golden globe & academy award nominations) Denis, in my opinion, has the edge in terms of racial exploration (although not to say that Haneke doesn't show racism in a masterful way). With films like Funny Games & Cache, Haneke clearly has a thing about "white guilt" and hints of insecurity or self hatred when it comes to racism whereas Denis is much more comfortable exploring racial issues.
Even if you don't agree with my theory (which is understandable depending on who you think are the best) you can still see where I'm coming from and understand my reasoning. I’ve read just about every piece of available literature on both directors and have watched their combined filmographies (while analyzing every single frame along the way) an unhealthy amount of times. I’m not the only person with this belief. In the last 10+ years Denis & Haneke have been praised by all the legitimate film publications and some of the best reviews, essays & write-ups have been based of off their films (BFI named Claire Denis filmmaker of the decade a few years ago). See my analysis on both Haneke & Denis from 2011. I'm curious to hear what you all think about Haneke & Denis impact on cinema today. Am I way off or on to something here?

Friday, December 28, 2012

THE CINEMA OF DETACHED & DESENSITIZED YOUTH IN MODERN CINEMA

Afterschool (2008)
Prejudge independent & art house cinema all you want (its slow, it’s pretentious, it doesn’t make any sense) but filmmakers within that scene have been exploring violence, detachment & desensitization among youth (a problem that's worse than ever these days) masterfully for decades. Do movies hold all the answers (or any for that matter)? Not really. And this is ME saying this. But there are some important films out there that can bring about some good dialogue & discussion better than any impulsive or irrational facebook status update. Although they are the two biggest issues, Gun control & mental illness (along with ways to spot, handle & properly treat mental illness) aren't the only issues of concern regarding all these mass killings & violent outbursts where we usually see a young person behind the trigger
Elephant (2003)
After Larry Clark squeezed absolutely everything he could out of the "youth of America gone wild" genre, highlighted by Kids & Wassup Rockers, it was time for new territory to be explored. Times were changing. Teens doing drugs at parties, driving drunk, getting pregnant too young, etc, will always be a concern but there were other issues that weren’t being addressed on the big screen like the Internet, the impact of television, senseless violence, easy access to disturbing viral videos and the negative effect all of that could possibly have on young minds if sponged up in excess. Youth were (and still are) downloading & file sharing snuff videos, going on chat roulette and videotaping school fights with cell phone cameras and posting them all over the Internet. Bigger films like American Beauty tried to touch on this with the Wes Bentley character (the awkward, emotionless teen who went around videotaping plastic trash bags floating in the wind), but not only did American Beauty just graze over issues of desensitized youth but it also kinda insulted youth with this unrealistic & silly portrayal (lets be real, teens with video cameras aren’t going around filming plastic trash bags. They're videotaping school fights and bully sessions). While American Beauty continues to get praise for being "daring" & "controversial", other films were (and still are) lightyears ahead in dealing with relevant issues. In 1992 Michael Haneke gave us Benny's Video - a film, loosely based on the true story of a young boy who filmed himself killing a young girl just to see what it would be like to kill (I’ve kinda simplified the film but that’s the basic premise). Naturally a piece on desensitized youth written by yours truly is gonna mention Todd Solondz (a master of representing teens in my opinion), and his 2001 feature; Storytelling, where Paul Giamatti plays an aspiring documentary filmmaker who follows an apathetic average teen around for a film project. In 2003, Gus Van Sant gave us the columbine inspired Elephant about two isolated bullied teens who go on a shooting spree in their high school. In that same year Olivier Assayas gave us the strangely awesome Demonlover which ends with a nameless teen in "Anywhere America" stealing a credit card out of the pocket of his father to buy a membership to a hardcore S&M porn site where the models are brutally tortured. As that final scene unfolds we see the teen watch this torture porn with no emotion on his face at all. In recent years Ezra Miller has become somewhat of a poster child for desensitized youth in film appearing in both; Afterschool (Antonio Campos' 2008 drama about the death of two teen girls caught on the cell phone camera of a fellow classmate) & We Need To Talk About Kevin (another Columbine-inspired story about the aftermath of a high school massacre told from the perspective of the mother of the student responsible for the killings). Actually, We Need To Talk About Kevin is the ONE film in the bunch I have some form of reservation about including (Kevin clearly had problems long before his teenage years)
There's also "2nd tier" works like; Paranoid Park (also directed by Gus Van Sant in a very similar style as Elephant), Water Lilies (which is more about sex than it is about violence and the Internet) & Mean Creek (which is pretty average & "sundancy" but it’s still kinda relevant to this write-up). I’m sure there’s a film or two I may have missed but I feel these select few pretty much cover all the bases of what I wanna touch on in this write-up.
Benny's Video (1992)
Even though the key films I just mentioned come from completely different directors with completely different backgrounds, experiences & upbringings, they all feature a lot of the same elements. First of all, with the exception of We Need To Talk About Kevin & Storytelling, the presence of parents & adults in these films are at a minimum. This is an element that I feel comes from the cinema of Larry Clark. In all of his prominent works that focus on youth (Kids, Wassup Rockers, Bully & Ken Park) the adults & parents are either absent, barely seen or out of touch and have no idea what’s going on with their kids. The only two prominent adult figures in Van Sant's Elephant (that we only see in two scenes) are the high school principal and a father of one of the main characters. Benny's parents (Benny’s video) are barely seen for the first half of the film and only really make their presence known towards the end. The parents in Storytelling are too caught up in being suburbanites to realize how completely fucked up all their kids are (especially their youngest who comes off like a young tea party member). John C. Reilly is the epitome of the clueless parent that doesn’t know his kid in We Need To Talk About Kevin. Or was his character just in denial? When the parents in these films finally do step up to be the adults in a situation that requires them too, they're either too late or make shitty decisions. At the start of Elephant, the only parental figure is drunk and it’s his son (who probably doesn’t even have a license) that has to drive himself to school. The parents in Benny's Video try to do what they think is best by covering up the murder their son committed. In the end it’s Benny that does the adult thing and turns himself in. Desensitization is somewhat a reflection of parenting. On a certain level parents (that are around) have the power to control senseless violence or the amount of blinky/flashy things their kids watch and the number of “screens” they put their face in. When kids can easily access (or produce & upload) footage of other teens fighting in the back of a high school, 2 girls 1 cup or a Serbian military be-heading there needs to be a parent or a parental figure for those that may not have parents to encourage their kids to socialize, read a book or go outside and get away from all the screens (TV, computer, ipads, iphone, etc) and interact with other kids outside of a social network and actually get in touch reality. Talk to your kids, be a part of their lives and know what’s going on. Benny's parents had no idea he watched footage (on the expensive equipment they bought for him) of animals being murdered non-stop but I'm sure they thought they were model parents with perfect children. Kevin's father had no idea he was a violent kid plotting to massacre his fellow classmates. The two teens that shoot up their school in Elephant were so unsupervised (we only see their parents for seconds towards the end of the film) that they were able to purchase guns online and have them delivered to their front door! Afterschool takes place in a private school, so right off the back the presence of parents shouldn’t be expected. Furthermore, Antonio Campos films all the adults, teachers & parents either from the neck up or out of focus giving the adults a detached almost inhuman-like presence. In one scene the main character, played by Ezra Miller, is talking to his mom over the phone trying to explain how isolated and lonely he feels and the only advice she gives him is to take medication or to just suck it up & deal with it.
Elephant
Beny's Video
The next thing all these films have in common is that the main characters are white male teens (I'm sure you've noticed by now that none of the teenagers in the images used so far of any other race). From columbine & aurora to the recent shooting in Newtown, all the shooters pretty much fit the same description (two of the shooters were in their early 20's, but still...). All these recent tragic events echo elements of Haneke's 71 Fragments Of Chronology Of Chance (the follow-up to Benny's Video) where the film ends with a college student snapping out of nowhere and shooting up a bank full of people then himself. This moment is immediately followed by random television clips of the news, game shows and other various television programs which are obviously meant to drive home the (possible) danger of television and how it can affect us. Desensitization & detachment was a common theme in Hakeke's early work. 71 Fragments was eventually followed up by Funny Games - a comment on violence in television & film and how pointless & formulaic it’s. Afterschool, Elephant & Water Lilies are the only three films in the group that show things from the perspective of teen girls. With the female characters in these films the desensitization is towards sex as opposed to violence. I do love most of the films in this group. Even stuff I find problematic & flawed like We Need To Talk About Kevin & Mean Creek are still important works. But the one major issue I have with just about all the (good) films concerning youth today is the what seems like exclusive exploration of white male teens with every other demographic playing the background or not really being represented at all. I guess Haneke gets a pass as his early films are based out of Austria where I imagine there aren’t many Blacks, Latinos, Asians and other races, but for American filmmakers who claim to be progressive or make progressive films (lets not kid ourselves, they may not right out call themselves progressive, but that’s their goal as filmmakers) I expect a little bit more diversity. When you see the real life shooters responsible for Columbine and other high school shootings or violent incidents involving teens it’s understandable that the films influenced by those events will focus mainly on young white males, but they aren’t the only ones to go to high school, or show signs of detachment & desensitization or are affected by violence. Just sayin’ – it wouldn’t hurt to add some color.
Afterschool
The emphasis of "the screen" is another important element in all these works. Once again, each of the aforementioned films features at least one key scene where our main character is zoning out in front of a screen (computer, television, tablet, whatever). Films like We Need To Talk About Kevin (which I did have many problems with) heightens this key scene by putting an emphasis on the lighting of the screen as it bounces of the blank zombie-like face of our character (similar to what haneke did in The Seventh Continent). Benny's Video shows our main character totally zoning out with hardly any emotion on his face while rewinding the same scene of a pig being shot in the head over & over. Benny's Video, along with Afterschool & Mean Creek, show things from a voyeuristic point of view. A good portion of these films are shown from the perspective of a camcorder & cell phone camera within the film. This gives off a cold almost soulless & detached feel - little to no music or dialogue and just an overall polarizing feel. Antonio Campos' Afterschool is very much Altman influenced (single take shots where the camera slowly zooms in without any cuts, little intricacies in the background that you have to pay attention too, etc)
Afterschool
Benny's Video
We Need To Talk About Kevin (2011)
Watching stuff like Benny’s Video almost feels like watching a warning sign. Although it was made in the early 90s before facebook, tablets, twitter, violent viral videos and other void filling distractions, the issues in that film are more prevalent now than they were 20 years ago when it was made. Am I saying parents should sit their pre-teens or teenagers down to watch some depressing Austrian film or a low budget American indie that only film nerds like me remember? Of course not. I’m suggesting that these films be checked out by people capable of comprehending the messages in them so they might have a little better understanding of what's going on today. Very few films have ever really painted youth as the complicated individuals that they really are, making Elephant (an American film dealing with American issues that got more respect in Europe than in its own country), Benny's Video, the earlier work of Todd Solondz and Afterschool rare gems that shouldn't be looked at as just typical movies.

Friday, February 17, 2012

MICHAEL: A WELL MADE FILM, BUT ALMOST POINTLESS AT THE SAME TIME

The only reason I saw this was off the strength that the person responsible for it (first time director Michael Schleinzer) was the casting director for two of the greatest films made in the last decade (Michael Haneke's 'The White Ribbon' & 'The Piano Teacher'). Not that that should be any definite indication that he'd be a great director, but if he had anything to do with the casting of those two films that means he should have SOME kinda talent. An association with the likes of Haneke will get you far on PINNLAND EMPIRE. But unfortunately Schleinzer's directorial debut is almost pointless and not even his association with one of my favorite directors (Haneke) could help him. If you're familiar with the type of film that 'Michael' is and the category/genre it falls under (a humanistic portrayal of child molesters/pedophiles, it may leave you going; "ok, sooooo...?" (similar to my reaction after watching 'Kill List'). I had more than one opportunity to see 'Michael' before it was released in theaters but the subject matter completely turned me off. Much like post-2003 films about high school shootings (see my review of the disappointing 'We Need To Talk About Kevin'), I get a little indifferent towards films about pedophilia these days (I know that sounds odd coming from Todd Solondz' #1 fan but hear me out...). After Dylan Baker's performance in 'Happiness' and Brian Cox's performance in 'L.I.E.' (two criminally underrated and snubbed roles), where else is there to go? What's left too explore in the genre of realistic and/or humanistic portrayals of pedophiles? (Oh and don't worry, I'm not gonna use this blog entry as another platform to rant about how someone else copied Todd Solondz' style)

A HUMANISTIC PORTRAYAL OF PEDOPHILES ON FILM IN THE 21st CENTURY:
Between the late 90's &the first half of the last decade, indie film had this sudden fascination with showing not only the reality of child molestation and pedophilia, but actually showing things from the pedophiles point of view, almost bordering on sympathy which is pretty dangerous and fucked up. Films like Francois Ozon's 'Criminal Lovers' (1999), Solondz' 'Happiness' (1998) & 'Palindromes' (2004), Michael Cuesta's 'L.I.E.' (2001) and Greg Araki's 'Mysterious Skin' (2004) are all examples of this. These films helped show people the real horrors of child molestation (and some films like 'Mysterious Skin' & 'L.I.E.' even went so far as to symbolize how important it is for fathers to be present in the lives of their sons). When you show the stereotypical creepy old man with one tooth or the heavily breathing sweaty monstrous man, sometimes it makes pedophilia and child molestation more like a fantasy and less realistic which shouldn't be the case. Hell, the Coen Brothers made us laugh subconsciously at pedophiles with characters like "Jesus" in 'Big Lebowski' (I wonder if people realize that when they wear one of those novelty Big Lebowski shirts with his image on it, they're wearing a picture of a fictitious child molester). The films I listed above were ahead of their time in that they showed us that everyone from the handsome baseball coach ('Mysterious Skin') to the neighborhood "uncle" that everyone loves ('L.I.E.') could have a dark side that no one could possibly know about.

'Happiness' (1998)



'L.I.E.' (2001)



'Mysterious Skin' (2004)



'Criminal Lovers' (1999)


But its 2012 and we (the audience) get it by now; pedophiles are monsters no matter how sympathetic or humanistic you try to portray them on film. Most people already know that a pedophile or sex offender could very well be the last person you expect (which is PART of what 'Michael' tries to convey). Why would someone wanna sit through 90 minutes of something that's super obvious? 'Michael' didn't really bring anything new to the table (outside of showing things from the abused child's perspective). Films like 'Mysterious Skin' & 'L.I.E.' already did what 'Michael' tried to do (show a complex father & son, big brother/little brother, tormented Stockholm syndrome relationship between the child  molester and his victim). In my opinion, when you're making a film about child molestation you kinda have to try and be somewhat original because if not, you're just making a slight variation of a movie that's already been done a million times before and it'll seem like your only purpose was to shock the audience (although that's not the case with this film).
'Michael' shows us the day to day life off "ordinary", middle class, "everyman": "Michael". He goes to work every day where he keeps his head down and socializing to a minimum, has a family that cares for him (a mother, a sister and a brother), pays his bills and does everything else you and I do. The only difference between Michael and the average everyman is that hes keeping a little boy ("Wolfgang") locked up in a secret shed beneath his house. That's right, hes a pedophile (and no one suspects him). His methods are precise and he's very careful not to get caught. But Michael's world slowly starts to crumble and he becomes more and more careless as the film progresses. Only in the final minutes of the film is there any type of a resolution...kinda. I say "kinda" because like I said earlier (as well as in the title of the blog), I felt nothing after watching it (outside of the obvious sympathy for the young kidnapped boy). I wasn't angry, sad, confused, disoriented or anything. All I could do was give a shoulder shrug and head home. If the point of 'Michael' was to show the horrific things that go on beneath the seemingly normal surface, then I'd rather watch 'Happiness'. If you're trying to make a film that questions the idea of what a "Monster" truly is, I'd recommend focusing on something other than a Pedophile because it's a little played out.

However, there were SOME good qualities about the film that shouldn't go unmentioned

MICHAEL HANEKE'S INFLUENCE ON MARKUS SCHLEINZER:
Working with Michael Haneke (who got a lot of influence from the later films of Robert Bresson) clearly had an effect on Markus Schleinzer's directorial debut. The somewhat slow pacing, the extended focus on banalities like preparing the table for dinner & washing the dishes afterwards as well as the minimal soundtrack totally reminded me of early Michael Haneke ("The Austrian Years"). I enjoyed the atmosphere of this film very much and I hope Schleinzer keeps it up for his next couple of films...

'Michael' (2011/12)



'The Seventh Continent' (1989)



'Michael'



'The Seventh Continent'



'Michael'



'71 Fragments...' (1994)


Like the ending of Haneke's '71 fragments' or the messages behind 'The 7th Continent' and 'Funny Games', its clear Markus Shcleinzer was trying to make an honest attempt at being thought provoking. Its also clear that not only did he spend lots of time watching early Haneke films, but other dark noir's like 'Vanishing'. Both 'Vanishing' and 'Michael' are about regular family men who are methodically plotting some diabolic criminal activity without anyone being suspicious of them (however the fate of our main character in 'Michael' is completely different than the fate of our villain in 'Vanishing'). Another thing you need to give Markus Schleinzer credit for is that with this kinda subject matter he had a golden opportunity to try and shock the audience (which woulda made it more problematic than it already is). This is such an easy route that quite a few first time directors have gotten caught up in over the years from the racist butcher punching his pregnant wife in the stomach in Gaspar Noe's 'I Stand Alone' to the blood splattering and ear chopping in Tarantino's 'Reservoir Dogs'. Outside of two kinda fucked up scenes that clearly indicate a rape has or will take place, there's no graphic or disturbing imagery. The intentions of the film were good, but I think there needed to be a little more thought put in to the story. Or maybe Schleinzer coulda used his obvious talents (which will serve him well in the future) on a whole different project all together. Whats strange is that I actually have the urge to watch this again. As far as plot or message go, I wanna give 'Michael' a C-/D+. But as far as film making, style and atmosphere go, I wanna give it a A-/B+. I guess no matter how many problems the film has, it still succeeded in some way. It got me to take the time out to write about it on my blog over other/better films that I plan on writing about in the future ('The Reflecting Skin', 'Yi Yi' & 'CQ' to name a few). It managed to draw a positive comparison to some works ('The 7th Continent', '71 Fragments' and 'Vanishing') so it did something right. But overall I wouldn't recommend this to anyone outside of a few people who's tastes i really know.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...